Maintaining A Cosmic Balance

°°°°°°°°°

We find it both indicative and amusing when people like us – post-WWII National Socialists and fascists who assert that the ‘holocaust’ is a myth, a legend – are accused of being “anti-Semitic” and of being full of “racial hatred” and of “inciting racial hatred”.

Indicative

Such accusations are indicative because concepts such as “racial hatred” and “inciting racial hatred” are modern inventions, innovations which when enshrined in criminal law – as there now are in many Western lands – represent a particular political agenda and a modern zeitgeist that is the foundation of that political agenda.

The zeitgeist is of the necessity and the encouragement of multi-racial societies based on the claim that all races are equal in terms of intelligence, ability, and in their propensity toward being good and just; and that it only such things as “racism” by Whites along with White colonialism, and “institution racism” in majority-White societies and nations that had kept and which keep non-White races – and especially “people of colour” – from realizing their potential and from showing that they are equal to White people in terms of intelligence, ability, and in their propensity toward being good and just.

The particular political agenda based on this zeitgeist is that of introducing criminal and civil laws in majority-White societies and nations, which laws (i) seek to promote a multi-racial society, (ii) seek to propagate the claim of “institution racism” in majority-White societies and nations, and (iii) seek to criminalize those who oppose such multi-racial societies by stereotyping such opponents as intolerant bigots, as racists, who are full of “racial hatred” and who “incite racial hatred”.

In addition, this political agenda now includes the assertion that majority-White societies and nations, especially in Europe, have a “duty of care” in respect of non-White races and which duty (i) demands that majority-White societies and nations accept and welcome and support non-White immigrants and refugees in their thousands and hundreds of thousands, and (ii) demands that majority-White societies and nations give aid to non-White Third World countries in Africa and elsewhere, and (iii) demands that majority-White societies and nations do not draw undue attention to the corruption, the lawlessness, the violence, that now exist in former European colonies or in lands once governed by a White minority such as Rhodesia and South Africa.

That this particular political agenda – part as it now is of government policy in most European lands – amounts to favouring non-Whites over Whites and to actively (almost tyrannically) suppressing White dissent against such a political agenda and the zeitgeist it is based upon, is not more widely known among White folk is (i) due to the propaganda campaigns waged by governments in favour of that political agenda and (ii) due to the propaganda campaigns of such governments to stereotype their opponents as intolerant bigots, as racists, who are full of “racial hatred” and who “incite racial hatred”.

Amusing

Such accusations are amusing because “holocaust denial” and “anti-Semitism” are also modern inventions, innovations which when enshrined in criminal law – as they now are in many Western lands – represent the same particular political agenda and the same modern zeitgeist that is the foundation of that political agenda.

Amusing to us because we know, we understand, how such tyrannical attempts to criminalize “holocaust denial” and “anti-Semitism” are, Aeonically, in the time-scale of centuries, of millennia, doomed to failure, knowing and understanding as we do that our folk, our White peoples, have sooner or later always rebelled against tyrants, against tyranny, against oppression, against unjust laws. For we in our majority have within us such an instinct, such a propensity, toward what is good and just, that we abjectly refuse to be dominated by those who are not good, who are not just.

Our so-called “anti-Semitism” is, for example, just our recognition of how a certain minority demands that we now accept both the modern zeitgeist – of racial equality – that they have invented and propagated {1} and the myth of the holocaust that they have also invented to stereotype and to criminalize us.

Amusing, because we know, we understand, that although they will “have their day” – evident for example in their Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine and in their “holocaust denial” laws – they cannot, in their hubris, affect The Cosmic Balance and thus cannot avoid the consequences of their hubris.

For we – we post-WWII National Socialists and fascists who assert that the ‘holocaust’ is a myth, a legend – currently represent and will in the future represent an aspect of that Cosmic Balance. Of the dialectic, the dissent, the rebellion, that informs – that makes – our human history, our human evolution.

Thus, as someone recently wrote in respect of the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine:

{quote}

                  Perceived Aeonically, the Zionist entity may well be successful, for a while: be it for some decades, be it for a hundred years or perhaps more. However, their success is dependant on the continuing support of America, on a continuing belief among the peoples of the West in both the legend of the holocaust, and in the myth supported by evangelical/traditionalist Nazarenes (especially in America) that their support for the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine is authorized by Nazarene Scripture which they believe revealed that their Nazarene God intended Palestine for those who consider themselves “the chosen people” as thus who regard themselves as the descendants of the Hebrews tribes mentioned in the Old Testament.

                  However, regarding American support, both the demographic and the belief of the people of America are changing. Demographically, the move is away from a White majority toward those hitherto ethnic minorities – the Hispanic and the Negro – who have an instinctive aversion to the policies and politics espoused by people such as The Vulgarian. {2} In terms of belief, it is estimated that, in America, every year around 3,000 Nazarene churches close due to falling congregations, with a 2017 study by the American based Public Religion Research Institute revealing that in 1996 around 65% of Americans identified themselves as White Christians while a decade or so later only 43% did so.

                  Thus it is reasonable to conclude that in a hundred or so years time the people of America, and their beliefs, will be different from that of today, with there being no guarantee of American support for the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine.

                  Regarding belief among the peoples of the West in the legend of the holocaust, although it is likely that over the next three or four decades more Western lands will introduce Zionist-supported tyrannical laws making questioning “the holocaust” a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment, the history of Western peoples over the last three millennia reveals that rebellion against tyrannical laws is inevitable, sooner or later, be that later a century or more. For every tyranny, every Empire, has its day with none, in the entire history of humanity, lasting more than three or four centuries. There is always a revolution or rebellions; there is always the death – from natural causes or otherwise – of a tyrant or potentate; there is always a change of government; always the removal, the overthrow – violent or otherwise – of a ruling cabal. And there are always new ideals, new ideas, new ways of living, which replace – gradually or otherwise – the old.

{/quote}

Thus, Aeonically, Cosmically, understood, the hubriatic pursuit by Zionists among White nations of their “racial equality” zeitgeist – and their hubriatic promotion of the myth of the holocaust – will eventually be their undoing.

Perhaps they will then understand – or more likely, given their physis and thus their history of hubris, they will not understand – that as Aeschylus wrote millennia ago:

                   Δίκα δὲ τοῖς μὲν παθοῦσιν μαθεῖν ἐπιρρέπει

                   “The goddess, Judgement, favours someone learning from adversity.” (Agamemnon, 250-251)

Richard Stirling
Reichsfolk
129 yf

{1} The roots of this zeitgeist are described in David Myatt’s seminal and heretical text Vindex: Destiny Of The West, available at https://reichsfolktimes.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/vindex-destiny-of-the-west.pdf

Editorial Note: That pdf edition was produced some years ago by an Australian who added a few footnotes to the text and an essay at the end. While the transcriber introduced a few typos and transcription errors into the text, these – and his few footnotes and end essay – do not detract from the value of that pdf version of Myatt’s text: from the fact that, to date, it is still the only publicly available edition of Myatt’s text, with rare secondhand copies of the 1984 printed edition fetching, as befits such an heretical text, high prices when they come up for sale, and thus kudos is due to the person who transcribed the printed text and produced that pdf version.

{2} qv. https://reichsfolktimes.wordpress.com/2018/07/20/the-vulgarian/


Advertisements

The Zionist Muppet Archives – Part One

°°°°°°°°°

Here are extracts from some recent – July/August 2018 – posts about the Zionist muppet posted by a person on a popular White nationalist web-forum. We have corrected some obvious typos.

°°°°°°°°°

Post #1

[Tommy Robinson] is a one-trick pony, banging on and on about a class of people with Muslim sounding names and about Islam but not about non-White immigration, not about creating a Whites-only society, not about how Blacks and some foreigners from eastern Europe and elsewhere are responsible for perhaps 50% of crime in places like London; and not about British values and what it means and what it did mean to be British.

For to me British racial nationalism means focusing on the problem of all non-White foreigners who now live in our country; focusing on immigration; focusing on crime committed by non-Whites; focusing on social problems such as addiction to drugs and unemployment among White youths; and focusing on British values and thus what it means to be British

In his apparent obsession with some non-White criminal types Mr Robinson shows his ignorance. For like his wealthy supporter – Daniel Pipes, a Zionist who is an American citizen of Jewish descent – he talks about “Muslim rape gangs” when the rational reality is that those belonging to such so-called “grooming gangs” are not practising Muslims who follow the guidelines of the Quran and the Sunnah. In addition, the fact that some or all of those criminals may have been born into Muslim families or may have Muslim sounding names is irrelevant, just as the fact that serial killers such as Dennis Nielson, Fritz Haarmann, and Peter Sutcliffe, may have been baptised as Christians or have Christian-sounding first names is irrelevant in respect of their adult crimes.

For no rational person in this modern day and age would condemn Christianity on the basis that some individuals baptised as Christians – or who have Christian-sounding first names – are serial killers, rapists, and murderers, Yet many Right-Wing and “alt-right” leaders, ideologues, and groups, propagandistically condemn Islam on the basis that those involved in some so-called “grooming gangs” have Muslim names or were born into Muslim families.

As for British values and what it means and what it did mean to be British I’ll quote from a post on a another thread.

[begin quote]

Taking the words out from the mouth of a wealthy former investment banker from the US of A, the likes of “Tommy Robinson” are the backbone of this country. That is, the likes of a convicted fraudster, a violent unreasonable criminal with a temper, are the backbone of this country.

Now, I’m around the same age as you so I guess you like me remember Britain in the 50’s and 60’s when our fathers had fought in the war and our mothers had endured the war, the rationing – in my case my mother endured The Blitz – and who tried to instil in us what it meant to be British.

For me and for them this meant fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.

Today you’ll find those values still alive in people like first-responders who have undertaken [non-political] deeds which have shown that they are courageous individuals who in dangerous or difficult situations have placed the life and safety of others before their own.

Those type of people are the backbone of this country, not some fraudster with criminal convictions who is bankrolled by wealthy Americans and Zionists.

As the new figurehead – the poster boy – of British nationalism the fraudster is going nowhere because the majority of decent White British people would never support him.

To be blunt, the dishonest fraudster is the exact opposite of those who are the backbone of this country.

[end quote]

In my opinion, this says all that needs to be said about “Tommy Robinson” aka Stephen Yaxley Lennon the fraudster. Like some other convicted criminals he has used many aliases.

Do you really think that decent White folk – in their majority – are going to support a convicted fraudster who has used numerous aliases?

°°°°°°°°°

Post #2

So the Zionist muppet – the fraudster publicly known by his alias “Tommy Robinson” – has been released from prison all thanks due to the pro-Zionist Middle East Forum – founded and run by Daniel Pipes, an American citizen of Jewish ancestry and a virulent Islamophobe – who spent a five-figure sum on hiring a team of lawyers led by an eminent Queen’s Council. {1}

That’s what secret friendly meetings with Jews {2} and publicly stating that you’re “a Zionist” {3} will get you.

Would the likes of Colin Jordan and John Tyndall have stooped so low as to accept money and help from Zionists? Having known them both, I don’t think so.

No doubt “Tommy Robinson” will have his moment of glory, but – in the pay of Zionists as he is – he is no British nationalist, just another Zionist muppet with Zionists now having, in respect of the “right wing”, the control “behind the scenes”, in Britain and Europe, they must have always dreamed about.

That many genuine British nationalists now seem to support such a Zionist muppet is a sad day for British nationalism.

(1} https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/22/us-rightwing-groups-bankroll-campaign-to-free-tommy-robinson

(2} https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tommy-robinson-manchester-jews-islamophobic-racism-edl-leader-english-defence-league-a7825016.html

{3} https://web.archive.org/web/20160202113803/http:/=2fwww.thejc.com/lifestyle/lifestyle-features/131131/what-makes-edl

°°°°°°°°°

Post #3

I have to admit to a degree of frustration, when even a significant victory against the totalitarian British state, has to be viewed through the perspective of the Stormfront mantra of “Everyone is a Jew.”

Reply:
I have to admit to a degree of frustration when people start defending someone who obviously is in the pay of Zionists and who proudly states that he is a Zionist.

We – meaning British nationalists and British National Socialists such as myself – don’t see Jews or Zionists everywhere. We just know enough history to know that our aims and goals, of for example creating a Whites-only nation, will not and never will be achieved by pandering to Zionists or by accepting money from them.

Why not? Because of the legend of the holocaust and because the new Zionist-invented definition and examples of so-called “anti-Semitism” – invented and given by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance and now used by British police forces and other official bodies to determine if a so-called “hate crime” has been committed – will always be used against us.

One of the examples given by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance is that it is “anti-Semitic” – and thus is in their view a “hate crime” – to accuse Jews, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

Now, if Tommy Robinson decides to denounce the holocaust and announce that it is a legend, a myth, invented by Jews in order for them to, among other things, create the new nation of “Israel” then I might change my opinion about the man.

°°°°°°°°°

Post #4

My only question is where is the leader who can lead us out of this circle of Jew control?

Reply:
I wish I knew but in my book he has to be someone ordinary White folk can trust; a person of upright character, who has proved he is “the right stuff” by his deeds (not words) and also of course a British nationalist who prefers to stay in Britain rather than go gallivanting around Europe and America with all his expenses paid by rich people with their own agendas.

Such a person would inspire personal loyalty, like Hitler did.

Those of us who’ve been involved with racial nationalism for decades have seen many leaders come and go including Jordan and Tyndall but they inspired only a limited number of people who stayed loyal; never inspiring the type of large scale personal loyalty needed. In the case of JT his active “neo-nazi” past was always a problem in terms of the wider White British public who after all are the ones who could vote a nationalist movement into power.

°°°°°°°°°

Post #5

suppose, however unlikely, that TR is the man we need and has taken a lesson from history and is using jews

Reply:

No, I don’t believe it. Besides, his personal character and his history – as I’ve tried to explain – goes against everything I believe our cause is all about.

A convicted fraudster, with a list of other criminal convictions, with a short temper, who doesn’t live by and probably doesn’t even know the meaning of British values such as fair play and self-restraint, and who has never done any heroic non-political deeds which have proved his mettle, is most certainly not in my book “the man we need”.

The man we need is someone like a combat veteran, decorated for bravery; or someone – as I said in my first post on this thread – such as first responders who have undertaken (non-political) deeds which have shown that they are a courageous individuals who in dangerous or difficult situations have placed the life and safety of others before their own.

One reason Adolf Hitler was so respected – especially among the SA – was that he’d been on the front line in World War One and had been decorated for bravery.

°°°°°°°°°

Post #6

what did (Hitler) have that could activate a nation like that?

Reply:
A genuine, deep, love of his people, his nation; a personal character forged by having spent four years at the front during the First World War; and having done courageous deeds during that conflict that showed that in dangerous or difficult situations he placed the interests of his people, the interest of his nation, before his own life […]

He spoke from the heart and because of his personal experiences and didn’t – like the majority of modern politicians – just read a script prepared beforehand by some flunkey script-writer.

He indistinctively felt, he indistinctively understood, what his German audiences felt and understood because he genuinely loved them and his fatherland.

His German audiences loved him because of that, and one of the things that Jewish propaganda has tried so hard to destroy – through for example their legend of the holocaust – is the German memory of that love, that bond.

°°°°°°°°°

Post #7

can you blame people who actively support him and the various other Civic groups when there is no Racial Nationalist group out there worthy of support. Instead of continually moaning about the situation we have somehow got to get our act together.

Reply:
I agree; it’s not the fault of those who support the new “chosen one” but a failure of leadership on our part. A failure that goes back over fifty years.

Like I keep saying we need someone who knows the meaning of and who represents British values such as fair play, honesty, and self-restraint, and who has a proven track record of non-political deeds which reveal that he – or perhaps she? – have been and are courageous individuals who in dangerous or difficult situations have placed the life and safety of others before their own.

Will such a courageous individual step forward before it’s too late?

°°°°°°°°°

Post #8

I believe the problem lies with the British people, everything has to be spelled out to them over and over again. They seem to refuse every opportunity to form their own opinions

Reply:
Hasn’t that been true about people – the masses – throughout Western history? The people – “the crowd” – always seem to need leadership, guidance, from the right kind of person.

We just don’t seem to have found – yet – the right person.

l remind everyone of John Tyndall’s favourite statement…. “In this country we don’t have a black problem, we have a white problem.”

I always respected JT and he was right about us having “a White problem.” But the reality is – in my opinion – that the solution is and always historically was one of leadership. Of the people being able to trust, follow, be loyal to, a leader whom they can respect and admire and who gives voice to – who presents a future vision of – their dreams, their hopes, for a better world for them and their children.

Much as I over the decades respected and admired JT and CJ and some others who assumed leadership positions they not only lacked the personal charisma to sway ordinary Brits but also did not have such non-political heroic deeds to their name as would have connected them to ordinary decent White folk.


Latest: The Tommy Robinson Saga

Reichsfolk

°°°°°°°°°

Confirming our earlier reports {1} the Zionist and wealthy Middle East Forum – founded and run by Daniel Pipes, an American citizen of Jewish ancestry – has now admitted {2} that

                  “The full resources of the Middle East Forum were activated to free Mr. Robinson. We: ° Conferred with his legal team and made funding available to them;
° Funded, organized and staffed the large “Free Tommy” London rallies on June 9 and July 14; ° Funded travel by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) to London to address the rally; and we ° Urged Sam Brownback, the State Department’s ambassador for International Religious Freedom, to raise the issue with the UK’s ambassador.”

In addition, they stated that

                  “In June, Mr. Robinson […] was covering a rape-gang trial involving Muslim defendants in England when he was arrested.”

Which statement reveals that they and Mr. Robinson – irrational and hateful as they are in their Islamophobia – propagandistically and illogically speak and write of “Muslim rape gangs” when, as we previously wrote {3},

                  “the reality is (i) that those belonging to such so-called “grooming gangs” are not practising Muslims who follow the Quran and Sunnah, and (ii) the fact that some or all of them may have been born into Muslim families is irrelevant, just as the fact that serial killers such as Dennis Nielson, Fritz Haarmann, and Peter Sutcliffe, may have been baptised as Christians is irrelevant in respect of their adult crimes.
                  No rational person – in this day and age – condemns Christianity on the basis that some individuals baptised as Christians are serial killers, rapists, and murderers, or have Christian-sounding names. Yet Right-Wing and “alt-right” leaders, ideologues, and groups, propagandistically condemn Islam on the basis that those involved in some so-called “grooming gangs” have Muslim names and/or were born into Muslim families.”

That the mainstream media have not exposed and lambasted such Islamophobes for such irrational beliefs is perhaps indicative of our times when “right-wing” Islamophobes are aided and financed and lauded by Zionists and never seem to be investigated by investigative journalists who really do believe in freedom of speech, or – if one or two dare to do so – the results of their investigations never seem to make it into print.

Who, for instance, has researched in detail the past of Mr Robinson: his early life, his crimes, his drug-dealing, his time as a burglar? How he obtained a passport under the name of Paul Harris; and so on.

Reichsfolk Times
August 2018.

{1} https://reichsfolktimes.wordpress.com/2018/07/22/bankrolling-a-criminal-low-life/

{2} https://www.meforum.org/articles/2018/tommy-robinson-free-mef-heavily-involved

{3} https://reichsfolktimes.wordpress.com/2018/07/25/the-fundamental-flaws-of-right-wing-islamophobia/


Summarizing The Case Of Tommy Robinson

Adolf Hitler

°°°°°°°°°

The important points, in my view, are:

(i) that given the criminal past of “Tommy Robinson” and his behaviour he does not represent British values and in fact is in many ways the opposite of what a British nationalist leader should be;
(ii) he does not represent the values of Western civilization which values are those of reason, of chivalry, honesty, and manners, of freedom of religion and belief, and of equal and impartial justice under the law.
(iii) he is being and has been funded by Zionists and Zionist organizations and has held secret meetings with Jewish groups, and thus is little more than a Zionist muppet.

The wealthy former investment banker and former confidant of Trump, Steve Bannon, recently said – following an interview on LBC radio – that “Tommy Robinson is the backbone of this country.”

So, according to the likes of Bannon and many other supporters of Robinson the backbone of Britain is made up of violent criminals and fraudsters who are full of hatred and intolerance.

No wonder nationalist parties have failed to achieve power and no wonder they have no realistic prospect of achieving power in the near future given that they’re setting up people like Robinson as their figurehead.

Those who really are the backbone of Britain are those who embody virtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.

People like Robinson – and the Americans and others who now support him – are virulent in their praise of Western civilization and Western values without realizing that they themselves with their ignorance, their lack of manners, are excellent examples of the new barbarians assailing Western culture.

For what does Western culture mean to such people? Does it mean the culture of a Christian-derived humility, of chivalry and manners, of fairness, of freedom of religion, and of equal and impartial justice under the law?

No of course not, judging by the views, the behaviour, and the violent hatred of those ill-informed, uncourteous, new barbarians.

Naturally, the supporters of the new barbarians, the new type of European nationalists, would argue and have argued that the threat from Islam – and from certain types of foreigners who commit certain crimes in our lands – is so great that it over-rides chivalry, manners, fairness, and even rational logical argument.

But if you abandon the values which have made Western civilization what it is then in my opinion you’re no better than the uncivilized people you’re fighting.

Robinson and his ilk have, for example, abandoned rational logical argument committing as they do basic errors of reasoning. Thus they

                  “illogically speak and write of “Muslim rape gangs” when the reality is (i) that those belonging to such so-called “grooming gangs” are not practising Muslims who follow the Quran and Sunnah, and (ii) the fact that some or all of them may have been born into Muslim families is irrelevant, just as the fact that serial killers such as Dennis Nielson, Fritz Haarmann, and Peter Sutcliffe, may have been baptised as Christians is irrelevant in respect of their adult crimes.
                  No rational person – in this day and age – condemns Christianity on the basis that some individuals baptised as Christians are serial killers, rapists, and murderers, or have Christian-sounding names. Yet Right-Wing and alt-right leaders, ideologues, and groups, propagandistically condemn Islam on the basis that those involved in some so-called “grooming gangs” have Muslim names and/or were born into Muslim families.” {1}

The real problem is not Islam or Muslims, it’s the multicultural societies which are now the norm in almost all Western lands. The solution is not tirades and demonstrations against Islam but the creation of White-only homelands and this requires political power and which political power requires racial nationalist leaders who represent Western values and who are the best of our folk and thus whom our people can respect and trust.

Can our people – will they in their majority – trust the likes of a convicted fraudster? Of course not.

What type of person can our people respect and trust? Someone like a combat veteran, decorated for bravery. Someone like a first-responder who has undertaken practical deeds which revealed that they are a courageous individual who when in dangerous or difficult situations have placed the life of others and of their country before their own. Those are the type of people who are “the backbone of our country”, not a convicted fraudster.

It is no coincidence that Adolf Hitler – from humble beginnings – achieved what he did. For he was respected and trusted by the majority of his people because he had a Western character born from combat experience and had been decorated for bravery.

Polemicus The Younger
July 129 yf

{1} https://reichsfolktimes.wordpress.com/2018/07/25/the-fundamental-flaws-of-right-wing-islamophobia/

°°°°°

Related:
Exposing A Far Right Cause Célèbre


Redefining Anti-Semitism

Reichsfolk

°°°°°°°°°

Redefining Anti-Semitism
A Tale For Our Times

The current political row about so-called “anti-Semitism” in the British Labour party is a relevant tale of our times for several reasons.

I.         It is a relevant tale, firstly, because the term “anti-Semitism” is a fairly recent invention, dating from the 1870’s but only becoming common in English due to the anti-German propaganda that proliferated before and during the Second World War. {1} As defined in the Complete Oxford English Dictionary (Second edition, 1989) it means “hostility and prejudice directed against Jewish people, and the theory, action, or practice resulting from this.”

II.         It is a relevant tale, secondly, because it reveals how influential and powerful certain Jewish advocacy groups are since they have for years lobbied the British government – and police forces and other official bodies – to accept the new definition of “anti-Semitism” invented by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA).

The IHRA’s definition is: “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

However, as well of this definition, the IHRA helpfully provide examples of what according to their definition constitute the “crime” of “anti-Semitism”. Among their examples are the following:

           ° Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

           ° Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

           ° Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour.

           ° Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

Since this IHRA definition – and its examples – define things which it advocates and supporters consider to be “wrong”, morally reprehensible, it should be obvious that it enshrines an ideology; that is, it is a scheme of ideas relating to ethics, politics and society, and forms the basis of action and policy.

Furthermore, since this ideology, enshrined in the IHRA definition and its examples, is now increasingly being used by police forces, councils, and other official bodies, to determine if a “hate crime” has been committed, it is clear that there is a movement, not yet written in law but continually agitated for, to make things such as a “certain perception of Jews”, “holocaust denial” and criticism of Zionists and of the Zionist entity itself, punishable crimes in the modern West.

That this ideology – whose advocates and supporters seek to criminalise “a certain perception” that some other people do not like or approve of – is an assault on freedom of expression and freedom of belief should be obvious. That this assault is still not obvious to many is tribute to just how effective the propaganda of the Zionist lobbies and of “holocaust remembrance” lobbies is and has been, for such propaganda – repeated almost every day, every week, every year, since 1945 – is that “anti-Semitism led to the horrors, the inhumanity, of the holocaust and such horrors must never be allowed to happen again.”

Yet if – as those who write and speak in favour of historical revisionism claim and believe – the holocaust did not happen as portrayed in the holocaust literature then persecuting and criminalizing those who question or doubt it is repressive and intolerant. This intolerance was summed up following the criminal conviction in May 2018 in a British court of law of a singer – Alison Chabloz – just for singing songs questioning the veracity of the holocaust, with the leader of the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism declaring that “in Britain Holocaust denial […] will not be tolerated.”

In other words, advocates and supporters of a particular ideology demand that their zealous intolerance becomes official policy and is enshrined in the law of the land, just as they rejoice when someone is convicted in a court of law on the basis of the intolerant ideology they advocate and support.

It really does seem as if we in the West have not learned much from the religious intolerance of former centuries when those who did not believe in certain things – and who perhaps had “a certain perception” that differed from what was then the accepted, the non-heretical, norm – were persecuted and criminalized.

III.         It is a relevant tale, thirdly, because it reveals just how intertwined the modern legend of the holocaust is (i) with re-defining “anti-Semitism”, (ii) with intolerant attempts to criminalize “a certain perception”, (iii) with support for and the survival of the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine, and (iv) with the religious belief that the Jews were and are the “chosen people of God” and that therefore they have a God-given right and duty to create and then to live in the Zionist entity. Hence, of course, the Zionist “law of return”.

For without the legend of the holocaust the Zionist entity would either not exist or would not be supported as it is and has been – economically, financially, militarily, propagandistically and otherwise – by the wealthy nations of the modern West.

It should therefore come as no surprise that, in an unguarded moment, the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, Dr. Jakobovits, declared that “The Jews were chosen to act as pathfinders for the world, and Israel has a special place as an instrument to effect the Jew’s social engineering upon the world.” {2}

Where by the term “social engineering” he meant and implied both (i) government and State efforts (through laws, propaganda and other means) to influence the attitudes and ideas of people and the structure of society, and (ii) efforts by the Media and special interest groups to bring about certain changes in society.

For re-defining the term “anti-Semitism”, criminalizing questioning or doubting the legend of the holocaust, and – among things – demanding that a certain ideology becomes official policy and is enshrined in the law of the land, most certainly amounts to social engineering.

Haereticus
23rd July 2018 ev

{1} An example of such propaganda occurred in The Economist magazine dated 24th August 1935: “The Nazi Party stalwarts […] have all been leading an anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, anti-Protestant crusade.”

{2} The Guardian newspaper (London), 7th August 1982.

°°°°°°°

Relevant & Necessary Disclosure:
It should also be noted that the pseudonym Haereticus – “a heretic” – is used by several different authors.


Bankrolling A Criminal Low-Life

Reichsfolk

°°°°°°°°°

Media reports have now confirmed {1} what we mentioned a few days ago {2}. Which is that the criminal low-life known publicly by the alias Tommy Robinson is, given his “wealthy Zionist backers,” being supported by an eminent Queen’s Council.

The pro-Zionist Middle East Forum – founded and run by Daniel Pipes, an American citizen of Jewish ancestry and a virulent Islamophobe – has so far spent a five-figure sum on Tommy Robinson’s legal defence as well as “paid for foreign speakers to attend Free Tommy rallies in the UK.” {1}

In addition, former investment banker and former confidant of The Vulgarian In Chief {3}, the wealthy Steve Bannon, is reported to have said, following an interview on LBC radio, that “Tommy Robinson is the backbone of this country.”

So, according to the likes of one of the people bankrolling and supporting Mr Robinson, a convicted violent criminal, a fraudster, an Islamophobe, and drug-dealer is “the backbone” of Britain. Which statement in support of a convicted violent criminal, a fraudster, an Islamophobe, and a drug-dealer, surely says everything that needs to be said about the opinions and character of a wealthy former investment banker. No doubt Mr Bannon – following in the footsteps of The Vulgarian In Chief – will now denounce the report of his comments as “fake news”.

That Zionists and wealthy Americans are bankrolling and supporting a violent convicted criminal who has no respect for the rule of law – and trying to make him a figurehead of the Far Right in Britain – is proof positive that Mr Robinson is just a muppet: a gormless obscure puppet until the puppet becomes animated and then propagandistically hyped by others manipulating the puppet. That so many among the Far Right in Britain and elsewhere now seem to believe – as a result of such manipulation and such propaganda – that the muppet in question really is or could be “the backbone of Britain” and a suitable figurehead is surely proof enough of just how gullible such people are and just how out of touch they are with the British virtues of those who really are “the backbone of Britain” and who thus embody virtues irtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.

Haereticus
22nd July 2018 ev

{1} https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/22/us-rightwing-groups-bankroll-campaign-to-free-tommy-robinson
{2} https://reichsfolktimes.wordpress.com/2018/07/20/exposing-a-far-right-cause-celebre/
{3} https://reichsfolktimes.wordpress.com/2018/07/20/the-vulgarian/


Exposing A Far Right Cause Célèbre

Reichsfolk

°°°°°°°°°

A Far Right Cause Célèbre

We present here a series of articles first circulated {1} between May and July of this year – 2018 ev / 129 yf – which deal with what has become a cause célèbre for what is often termed the modern “extreme right-wing” – the Far Right – movement in Britain.

This cause célèbre is the recent jailing of an activist publicly known by his alias “Tommy Robinson” – real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – for the crime of Contempt of Court.

The first article – The Mickey Mouse Activist, first published on the 21st May 2018 – asked questions about how Mr Robinson managed to finance his life-style and his European trips, and how he and the splintered Far Right managed to organize and finance a slick professional event in 2018 in Whitehall, London with a ginormous television screen, international satellite feeds, and a high quality sound system.

In two articles – How To Spot A Zionist Muppet, published on 4th June 2018, and A Zionist Muppet By Any Other Name, published on the 12th June 2018 – we drew attention to the criminal past of Mr Robinson and to his secret meeting with Jewish leaders.

In the latest article – Financing A Zionist Muppet, published on 13th July 2018 – the answer to questions about finance and slick organization was provided: the answer being that Mr Robinson was backed and supported by the wealthy and influential pro-Zionist American based Middle East Forum run by Daniel Pipes, an American citizen of Jewish ancestry and a virulent Islamophobe. The Middle East Forum and its wealthy supporters – such as Sam Brownback, a US ambassador – were instrumental in making the case of Mr Robinson a cause célèbre for the Far Right and the so-called “Alt-Right” in Britain and elsewhere.

In another article – A Negation Of British Virtues, published on 26th June 2018 – we re-iterated the criminal past of Mr Robinson and described that dishonest, ignorant, violent, impulsive, criminal, that fraudster, as a negation of British values and as totally unsuitable to be the “figurehead” for the Far Right in Britain and

                  “which Far Right is supposed to be, or at least once was, a movement for law and order and for and of traditional British virtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.”

With the result of the appeal by Mr Robinson against his jailing for Contempt of Court pending – an appeal unsurprisingly supported (given Mr Robinson’s wealthy Zionist backers) by an eminent Queen’s Council – we anticipate that a successful appeal will cement Mr Robinson’s figurehead status among the British Right, which will, as we noted in one of the articles, surely say

                  “much about what the Far Right and the “Alt-Right” in Britain have seemingly become: morally bankrupt, and a negation of traditional British virtues; virtues which built and which for centuries maintained the largest civilizing Empire in human history.”

Several of the articles contrast the tolerant attitude of Adolf Hitler and The Third Reich towards Muslims, and the Islamophobic attitude of the likes of Mr Robinson and Zionists such as Daniel Pipes and those who support his Middle East Forum.

In addition, although Mr Robinson is often described – especially by anti-fascists – as a “fascist”, in our opinion he most certainly is not a fascist given that fascism means “the advocacy of a particular nationalist viewpoint or form of government in a manner that seeks to ensure a certain conformity and an orderly way of life based on a particular definition of a nation and/or of a people.” His character, his actions, the crimes he has committed – such as fraud – are not the character, the actions, the behaviour of someone promoting an orderly way of life. Perhaps the most apt description of him is “a Zionist muppet”.

The articles below are in date order, with latest placed first.

Richard Stirling
Reichsfolk
July 20th 2018 ev / 129 yf

{1} The articles were first published on this hitherto private, invitation-only, Reichsfolk blog and subsequently re-published on some other blogs, especially those sympathetic to National-Socialism. Some of the articles were attributed to Haereticus – i.e. to “a heretic” – and others to RS, i.e. to Rachael Stirling.

°°°°°°°

Financing A Zionist Muppet

The mystery of who financially and logistically is backing the pro-Zionist criminal – the fraudster – known publicly by his alias “Tommy Robinson” has been solved.

It is The Middle East Forum and its wealthy supporters such as Sam Brownback who is currently a US ambassador in the administration of The Vulgarian In Chief.

The Middle East Forum is a policy institute founded and run by Daniel Pipes, an American citizen of Jewish ancestry and an Islamophobe who uncritically supports the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine. For such support and for his “Israel Victory Project” (which advocates continued Zionist domination of occupied Palestine) Pipes was presented with the Guardian of Zion Award by the Bar-Ilan University in Tel Aviv.

The Middle East Forum was “the power behind the scenes” which organized and funded the recent “Free Tommy Robinson” demonstration in London and was instrumental in funding and lobbying some 500,000 people to sign a pro-Robinson on-line petition in May of this year.

That an influential, well financed, pro-Zionist American institute and its wealthy supporters are backing a British fraudster with a long history of criminal convictions {1} should come as no surprise given Robinson’s support for the Zionist entity and his febrile Islamophobia.

As we noted in a recent article {2}, the shady criminal past and personal character of “Mr Robinson” – a.k.a. Stephen Christopher Yaxley, a.k.a. Stephen Lennon, a.k.a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, a.k.a. Andrew McMaster, a.k.a. Paul Harris – makes him totally unsuitable to be
                   “the figurehead of the far-right in Britain which Far Right is supposed to be, or at least once was, a movement for law and order and for and of traditional British virtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.
                   That so many among the Far Right and the ‘Alt-Right’ in Britain now accept such a dishonest, ignorant, violent, impulsive, criminal as their figurehead – and rally round to support him, whatever he does, such as his recent attempt to pervert the course of justice, for which he was jailed – surely says much about what the Far Right and the ‘Alt-Right’ in Britain have seemingly become: morally bankrupt, and a negation of traditional British virtues; virtues which built and which for centuries maintained the largest civilizing Empire in human history.”

To which we would now add that those among the Far Right and the “Alt-Right” in Britain who support Mr Robinson, The Zionist Muppet, are letting themselves be manipulated by Zionists for the sake of the Zionist cause, one of the foundations of which cause is Islamophobia.

In contrast to such Zionist Islamophobia, Adolf Hitler and German National Socialists sought to co-operate with Muslims. As Waffen-SS General Leon Degrelle said:

                   “German racialism meant re-discovering the creative values of their own race, re-discovering their culture. It was a search for excellence, a noble ideal. National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race, and wished that all other races did the same for themselves.
                   That was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS. The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs, and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an imam, each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression. This was our racialism. I was present when each of my Islamic comrades received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a pendant with a small Koran. Hitler was honoring them with this small symbolic gift. He was honoring them with what was the most important aspect of their lives and their history. National Socialist racialism was loyal to the German race and totally respected all other races.”

Our modern racialism should do likewise, as demanded by British – by European – virtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, and honesty. That is, be loyal to our own kind and to our culture but respect other races and their beliefs and culture. A modern – an honourable – racialism manifest in the ethical National Socialism of Reichsfolk. {4}

RS
129 yf

{1} The criminal past of “Mr Robinson” – who, like many criminals, has used numerous aliases over the years – includes conviction for fraud, for which he was jailed, and convictions for burglary and possession of cocaine, as well as a conviction for passport fraud, for which he was also jailed. How he acquired another passport under the alias Paul Harris and used it travel from the United States – another criminal offence – has never (to our knowledge) been investigated by the police.

{2} A Negation Of British Virtues.

{3} Epic: The Story of the Waffen SS (Lecture given in 1982). Reprinted in The Journal of Historical Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 441-468.

{4} https://reichsfolktimes.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/intro-reichsfolk.pdf

°°°°°°°

A Negation Of British Virtues

As expected, given the pro-Zionist stance of the fraudster publicly known by his alias “Tommy Robinson”, many politically active antifascist groups now publicly consider him and his supporters “a threat” and describe him as “a violent far-right racist” and as “the figurehead of the far-right in Britain”. Which concern and which designations by them are sure to encourage further support for the fraudster among the Far Right, among those who are “Alt-Right”, among those who are racist, and among those who are violently racist or who believe that violence is a viable option.

That no antifascist group has highlighted his uncritical support for Zionists, his support for the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine, and his support for holocaustianity – the new religion of our times {1} – is interesting and perhaps indicative.

Perhaps more interesting and more indicative is the reluctance of politically active antifascist groups to continually draw attention to – to focus on – (i) the non-political criminal past of Mr Robinson {2}, (ii) his abject ignorance of Islam and the Muslim way of life, and (iii) how he has managed to support himself for years and have the financial resources to regularly travel around Europe.

All of which – but especially his criminal past – make this shady criminal character totally unsuitable to be “the figurehead of the far-right in Britain” which Far Right is supposed to be, or at least once was, a movement for “law and order” and for and of traditional British virtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.

That so many among the Far Right and the “Alt-Right” in Britain now accept such a dishonest, ignorant, violent, impulsive, criminal as their figurehead – and rally round to support him, whatever he does, such as his recent attempt to pervert the course of justice, for which he was jailed – surely says much about what the Far Right and the “Alt-Right” in Britain have seemingly become: morally bankrupt, and a negation of traditional British virtues; virtues which built and which for centuries maintained the largest civilizing Empire in human history.

Haereticus
June 2018 ev

{1} One thing that every Western political leader or potential leader is obliged to do – and has done for decades – is visit the Zionist entity and show their support for holocaustianity by a solemn visit to Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Centre. Failure to do so is political suicide, with holocaustianity being the founding myth of the Zionist entity and the means whereby that entity acquires and has acquired, from the West, military superiority in the Middle East.

This obligation now extends to the British Royal Family, as witness the recent visit by Prince William.

{2} The criminal past of “Mr Robinson” – who, like many criminals, has used numerous aliases over the years – includes conviction for fraud, for which he was jailed, and convictions for burglary and possession of cocaine, as well as a conviction for passport fraud, for which he was also jailed. How he acquired another passport under the alias Paul Harris and used it travel from the United States – another criminal offence – has never (to our knowledge) been investigated by the police.

°°°°°°°

A Zionist Muppet By Any Other Name

That the “right-wing activist” activist and fraudster known publicly by his alias “Tommy Robinson” has garnished and continues to garnish widespread Media publicity in Britain, Europe, and elsewhere despite his criminal past is surely indicative of just how certain well financed individuals and entities support him.

For the fact that the “right-wing activist” activist known publicly by his alias “Tommy Robinson” is a Zionist muppet was confirmed by the fact that MEP Janice Atkinson recently launched a defence of “Tommy Robinson” on the floor of the European Parliament and by the fact that the wealthy Alex Jones, who bankrolls the popular website InfoWars, via his “Twitter” account spread propaganda in defence of the muppet. Support for the Zionist muppet was also voiced by British InfoWars writer Paul Joseph Watson and others.

Contrast all this public support for “Tommy Robinson” with the treatment of MEP Nick Griffin during Griffin’s tenure as leader of the British National Party. Whatever one may believe about the flaws of Nick Griffin and about his fitness to lead a nationalist party he was at the very least a committed anti-Zionist who had publicly expressed doubts about the “holocaust” which he referred to as “the Holohoax”. That he was interrogated in 2009 on the British TV programme “Newsnight” by a hostile audience and a hostile panel regarding his views on the “holocaust” and about other matters is in stark contrast to the TV appearances of “Tommy Robinson” the Islamophobe – and the alleged “right wing extremist” – who was never openly challenged about his obvious ignorance of Islam (such as his inability to read the Koran in Arabic) and who was never asked to explain and justify his criminal past, was never asked to explain why he had publicly declared himself to be “a Zionist” {1}, was never asked to explain why he had secret meetings with Jews {2} and was never asked why in respect of Muslims he repeatedly committed a fallacy of illicit transference.

That thousands of “right-wing extremists” in Britain and elsewhere now champion the Zionist-loving Mr Robinson as some sort of leader of their nationalist cause(s) is just so indicative of how so many “right-wing extremists” have forgotten or never known that their real enemy is Zionism, founded as modern (post-1945) Zionism is on what we – and other – real-life heretics believe to be “the myth of the holocaust”. That public expression of this heretical belief is now a criminal offence in many Western lands – punishable by imprisonment for many years – says all that needs to be said about genuine “free speech” just as the abject failure of the Zionist-loving Mr Robinson and his supporters to defend the free speech rights of “holocaust revisionists” says all that needs to be said about them and their “free speech” hypocrisy and propaganda.

RS
June 2018 ev

{1} https://web.archive.org/web/20160202113803/http://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/lifestyle-features/131131/what-makes-edl

{2} https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tommy-robinson-manchester-jews-islamophobic-racism-edl-leader-english-defence-league-a7825016.html

°°°°°°°

How To Spot A Zionist Muppet

It is relatively easy to spot a Zionist muppet: that is, a politician or political activist who, backed (secretly or otherwise) by Zionist money and by Zionists, does their bidding and aids the political and social agenda of Zionists, be such Zionists resident in the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine or be they resident elsewhere.

The first sign – criterion – is that the muppet is never, ever, publicly critical of the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine. The second sign is that the muppets have “secret meetings” with Zionists at which they pledge their support for the Zionist entity. The third is that the mainstream media are either restrained in their criticism of the muppet or do not criticize the muppet in the manner which the media criticise and continually hound their real opponents and real extremists; instead the media stories about the muppet are restrained and strive to be “balanced” and thus invariably give voice either to the point of view of the muppet or that of some of the supporters of the muppet. The fourth is that the Zionist muppet has financial resources, and a supply of skilled people, that any and every anti-Zionist politician or real-life “extremist” political activist either lacks or do not have the financial resources to employ. The fifth sign is that the muppet never, ever, questions the truth of “the holocaust”. The sixth sign is that the muppet is never, ever, the subject of public or media rumours questioning their past with the mainstream media never describing them in derogatory terms. The seventh and final sign is that the muppet publishes a book – whether “ghost-written” or not – which mysteriously becomes a “best seller” while books published by genuine anti-Zionists, genuine extremists, are lambasted in the media or banned or become so marginalized that they invariably disappear from public view without a trace.

That the political activist known by the alias “Tommy Robinson” fulfils all the above criteria should by now be obvious to all fascists and National Socialists.

Mr Robinson has never criticized the Zionist entity. He has had secret meetings with Zionists {1} and has even declared himself to be “a Zionist” {2}. The mainstream press do not print stories which portray him as – and nor do they continually criticize him for being – a convicted criminal and a violent hate-filled ignorant extremist. He has access to mysterious financial resources which enable him to freely travel around Britain and Europe and employ people to stage a slick propaganda event in Whitehall, London, complete with a ginormous television screen, international satellite feeds, and high-quality sound system. He has never, ever, questioned “the holocaust”. Neither the mainstream press nor any other media have undertaken investigations into – and printed or broadcast stories about – his real past, his personal habits, his crimes, and his claim to be an ambassador for a charity which, set up by others, existed only on paper. Instead, the media invariably rely on his own account of his life and invariably invite him to give interviews during which his views and opinions and his criminal past are never robustly criticized with his ignorance about certain matters never exposed by his opponents. His professionally produced books mysteriously become “best sellers” with their contents never lambasted in the mainstream media in a critical way. Finally, a sympathetic on-line petition about him mysteriously acquires over 500,000 signatures in a few days, a feat unmatched by any other modern “extremist” politician.

In other words, Mr Robinson – a convicted criminal and fraudster with a dodgy and drug-dealing past, who has used numerous fake identities and who pretended to be an ambassador for a charity which existed only on paper – has been set up, and hyped, by Zionists as the figurehead for the “extreme” right-wing in Britain and as a figurehead for the “extreme” right-wing in Europe and elsewhere.

That Zionists have so far succeeded in having a convicted criminal, a fraudster with a dodgy and drug-dealing past who has used numerous fake identities, accepted as a prominent “right-wing” political leader reveals the lamentable state of the “extreme” right-wing in Britain and elsewhere. It therefore does seem as if the modern Islamophobic “extreme” right-wing in Britain and elsewhere now get the type of mundane and pro-Zionist leaders they deserve.

That such revelations as these are not more widely discussed – or known – among modern fascists and National Socialists is surely a sign of just how many modern fascists and self-described National Socialists are out-of-touch with the reality of latter-day Zionist influence and subterfuge.

Haereticus
June 2018 ev

{1} According to a now neglected report in the Independent newspaper, “Tommy Robinson has met with members of Manchester’s Jewish community at a secretive event.” Source: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tommy-robinson-manchester-jews-islamophobic-racism-edl-leader-english-defence-league-a7825016.html

{2} https://web.archive.org/web/20160202113803/http://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/lifestyle-features/131131/what-makes-edl

°°°°°°°

The Mickey Mouse Activist

All hail the new ‘hero’ of fascism {1} in Britain and often elsewhere: the activist who perfectly sums up the lamentable state of British fascism today, and the activist who also mirrors the Mickey Mouse fascists of today.

The new ‘hero’ is a convicted criminal – jailed for both a money-making scam and for identity fraud – who uses and has used several pseudonyms; who spent several years inciting often violent public disorder in the name of opposing Islam, and then, as a publicity stunt, claimed to be friendly with Muslims and to have left his former anti-Muslim extremism behind. He then did another volte-face, returned to spouting anti-Islam rhetoric, and claimed to be an ambassador for a charity which, set up by others, existed only on paper, {2} all of which antics garnished him substantial media coverage, perhaps in part designed to hype his ghost-written ‘autobiography’ – which, with typical puffery, declared him to be an “Enemy of the State” – and which was written and published to garnish him a reputation as some sort of significant figure on the fascist scene.

This new fascist hero is “Tommy Robinson” – a.k.a. Stephen Christopher Yaxley, a.k.a. Stephen Lennon, a.k.a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, a.k.a. Andrew McMaster, a.k.a. Paul Harris.

How he supports himself and can afford to regularly travel around Britain and Europe is a mystery although his public support for Zionism and for the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine {3} as well as his bosom friendship with the likes of Jewish Islamophobe Pamela Geller may offer a clue. As may his other ‘ghost-written’ book, titled Mohammed’s Koran: Why Muslims Kill for Islam in which he has the hubris to pontificate at length about Islam, about the Prophet Muhammad, and about the Quran even though he cannot read Arabic, has to rely on translations and the opinions of others, has not studied the Quran and Sunnah under the guidance of Muslim scholars, and has never spent time living among Muslims in Muslim lands such as Egypt, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan. {4}

How he and cohorts can organize and finance a slick professional event in 2018 in Whitehall, London – with a ginormous television screen, international satellite feeds, and a high quality sound system – is also something of a mystery, given that even the BNP at the height of its popularity – with two Euro MP’s, paid employees, and several offices around the country – could not manage such a feat.

It is also something of a mystery why no one challenges or has challenged him – during one of his regular Media appearances, such as on the TV programme “Good Morning Britain” – about his ignorance regarding the Quran and his ignorance regarding the Muslim way of life. Why do the producers of such programmes not include a Muslim scholar who can, after quoting Arabic verses from the Quran and from the Sunnah, ask Mr Robinson to translate and explain them? Why does not someone ask Mr Robinson why, in relation to Muslims, he repeatedly commits a fallacy of illicit transference? Is it because Mr Robinson is a puppet of some cabal “behind the scenes” who want him to be seen as a viable leader of latter-day fascists?

That Mr Robinson, with his ignorance, his criminal past, his plebeian-like incitement, is representative of many latter-day fascists is self-evident. Does his behaviour, his character – and that of the majority of his supporters – conform to the warrior ideal of the elite Waffen SS, {5} or to the ideal of the SA who were constantly reminded of the need for

                   “Iron discipline! Exemplary appearance in public! The population […] must see in our SA a model of German breeding and orderliness…” {6}

No, the behaviour, the character, of Mr Robinson – and that of the majority of his supporters – does not and do not conform to the warrior ideal of the elite Waffen SS nor to the fascist ideal of the SA.

The likes of Oswald Mosley, Adolf Hitler, John Tyndall, and Colin Jordan would turn in their graves at the behaviour, the ignorance, and Mickey Mouse antics of Mr Robinson who has never once – to our knowledge – denounced “the holocaust” as a myth. For were he to do so he really would become an actual “enemy of the State”.

That he has failed that crucial “litmus test” means that he is just another “paper tiger” with latter-day fascists certainly deserving the type of Zionist-loving leader they now seem to increasingly follow and praise.

Haereticus
May 2018 ev

{1} Fascism: “the advocacy of a particular nationalist viewpoint or form of government in a manner that seeks to ensure a certain conformity and an orderly way of life based on a particular definition of a nation and/or of a people.”

{2} https://www.hopenothate.org.uk/2017/11/14/curious-tale-stephen-lennons-charity-partnership/

{3} See this article in the Jewish Chronicle: http://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/lifestyle-features/131131/what-makes-edl

See also the 2017 report in The Independent newspaper where it was reported that:

“Tommy Robinson has met with members of Manchester’s Jewish community at a secretive event where he is believed to have outlined his extreme views on Islam in a speech. The former English Defence League leader is said to have talked to around a dozen members in Prestwich, just outside Manchester city centre, until the early hours of last Thursday morning.” https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tommy-robinson-manchester-jews-islamophobic-racism-edl-leader-english-defence-league-a7825016.html

{4} In regard to Islam and National Socialism, as Waffen-SS General Leon Degrelle said:

                  “much “German racialism meant re-discovering the creative values of their own race, re-discovering their culture. It was a search for excellence, a noble ideal. National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race, and wished that all other races did the same for themselves.

                  “much That was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS. The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs, and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an imam, each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression. This was our racialism. I was present when each of my Islamic comrades received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a pendant with a small Koran. Hitler was honoring them with this small symbolic gift. He was honoring them with what was the most important aspect of their lives and their history. National Socialist racialism was loyal to the German race and totally respected all other races.” Epic: The Story of the Waffen SS (Lecture given in 1982). Reprinted in The Journal of Historical Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 441-468.

{5} The ideals of the Waffen SS – as opposed to the deluge of despicable Magian lies and propaganda about the Waffen SS – can be gleaned from the writings of Waffen SS General Leon Degrelle who was awarded numerous medals for war-time bravery including the Knight’s Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves, a German military award similar to the British Victoria Cross. His writings include:

° The Eastern Front: Memoirs of a Waffen SS volunteer, 1941-1945. Institute for Historical Review. 2014. ISBN 9780939484768.

° Hitler, né à Versailles. 1–3. Paris: Art et histoire d’Europe. 1986. ISBN 2906026085.

° Ich war Gefangener. Nürnberg: Hesperos Verlag. 1944.

° Hitler pour 1000 ans. Paris: La Table Ronde. 1969.

{6} NSDAP Hauptarchiv (Institute of Contemporary History, London) HA 9/188. Copy of Deutsches Sommerfest, 7th July 1928 containing an order from Fritz Reinhardt.


David Myatt And Reichsfolk

°°°°°°°°°

One question which we have been repeatedly asked since 2000 ev – and especially since 2012 ev – is why we publicize and use the National-Socialist writings of Mr Myatt given his conversion to Islam in 1998 ev and then his post 2012 ev development of his “philosophy of pathei-mathos” with his condemnation of German National Socialism and of Adolf Hitler.

Our answer, pre-2012, has always been along the following lines:

° That, in our opinion, his NS writings – such as those in the pdf collection the Selected National Socialist Writings Of David Myatt – are among the best modern writings about National Socialism and cement his reputation as “England’s principal proponent of contemporary neo-Nazi ideology and theoretician of revolution.” {1}

° Because even during his decade as a Muslim he not only such wrote gems as Esoteric Hitlerism: Idealism, the Third Reich and the Essence of National-Socialism and National-Socialism, Folk Culture, and a Muslim Khilafah (pdf) but also embarked upon a campaign to bring National-Socialists and Jihadi Muslims together in order to fight their common “Zionist” enemy. {2}

To which answer we, post-2012, have added the following:

° That we consider that he has in the words of JR Wright in her article One Man Above Time: David Myatt, Reichsfolk, Esoteric Hitlerism, and Savitri Devi (pdf) moved from living a practical “in Time” life to one that is totally “above Time”. {3}

° That in the context of Reichsfolk – with its emphasis on new, local, leaderless, folk communities as opposed to the concept of The State, and with the Reichsfolk emphasis on personal combat as opposed to impersonal war between States – Myatt’s criticism (i) of German National Socialism (predicated as it was on a powerful State and on kampf) and (ii) of Adolf Hitler, may well be valid since all “in Time” States and Empires and armies are, in the perspective of centuries, transitory, and since all leaders, however gifted and charismatic, are fallible and inevitably make mistakes and often commit the error of hubris. Was, for example, Hitler’s invasion of Russia a strategic mistake that inevitably led to the destruction of the Third Reich?

° That Myatt’s latest writings – such as his Classical Paganism And The Christian Ethos and his Tu Es Diaboli Ianua – as well as his translations of classical ancient texts such as Sophocles and Aeschylus and his Corpus Hermeticum: Eight Tractates expound the pagan ethos that formed the genesis of our Western “Faustian” civilization.

Thus we consider Myatt as migrating – due to his pathei mathos – from an “in time” activist and ideologue to an “above time” philosopher and mystic. As Savitri Devi wrote in her Lightning And Sun:

                  “But there are also men ‘outside Time’ or rather ‘above Time’; men who live, here and now, in eternity; who (directly at least) have no part to play in the downward rush of history towards disintegration and death, but who behold it from above – as one beholds, from a strong and safe bridge, the irresistible rush of a waterfall into the abyss – and who have repudiated the law of violence which is the law of Time…..
                  But the salvation which the men ‘above Time’ offer the world is always that which consists in breaking the time-bondage. It is never that which would find its expression in collective life on earth in accordance with Golden Age ideals. It is the salvation of the individual soul, never that of organised society…..
                  Men ‘outside Time’ or ‘above Time,’ at the most saviours of souls, have, more often than not, disciples who are definitely men ‘against Time.’
                  No organisation can live ‘outside Time’ – ‘above Time’ – and hope to bring men back, one day, to the knowledge of the eternal, values. That, all men ‘above Time’ have realised. In order to establish, or even to try to establish, here and now, a better order, in accordance with Truth everlasting, one has to live, outwardly at least, like those who are still ‘in Time’; like them, one has to be violent, merciless, destructive – but for different ends.
                  Knowing this, the real men ‘above Time’ are the first ones to understand and to appreciate the wholehearted efforts of their disciples ‘against Time,’ however awful these might appear to ordinary people…. The fallen world can never understand them.”

Most people today apparently do not understand David Myatt, and perhaps never will. But we like to believe we do.

Richard Stirling
Reichsfolk
July 129 yf

{1} Michael, George. The New Media and the Rise of Exhortatory Terrorism. Strategic Studies Quarterly (United States Air Force), Volume 7 Issue 1, Spring 2013.
{2} Michael, George. The Enemy of My Enemy: The Alarming Convergence of Militant Islam and the Extreme Right. University Press of Kansas, 2006, pp. 143ff.
{3} The categories “in time” and “above time” refer to Savitri Devi’s book The Lightning and the Sun in which she describes three basic types of leaders. Those “in time” – like Genghis Khan – who concentrate on military might; those “above time” – like the Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten – who are otherworldly and mystic; and those “against time” – like Adolf Hitler – who are both “in time” and “above time”, both Lightning and Sun.


One Man Above Time

David Myatt

°°°°°°°°°

We present here two neglected essays: the intriguing National-Socialism, Folk Culture, and a Muslim Khilafah written by David Myatt in 2003 during his campaign to bring National Socialists and radical Muslims together to “fight their common enemy”, and One Man Above Time: David Myatt, Reichsfolk, Esoteric Hitlerism, and Savitri Devi written by JR Wright in 2011 (and revised in 2015) which places the first essay and Mr Myatt into perspective as someone who due to his decades of peregrinations migrated from “in Time” activism to an “above Time” mystical way of life.

National-Socialism, Folk Culture, and a Muslim Khilafah
(pdf)

David Myatt, Reichsfolk, Esoteric Hitlerism, and Savitri Devi
(pdf)


Esoteric Hitlerism

Adolf Hitler

°°°°°°°°°

Editorial Note: We republish here in full the seminal article Esoteric Hitlerism: Idealism, the Third Reich and the Essence of National-Socialism first circulated in June 2000 ev. The article {1} expresses the idealism and the philosophy of the Reichsfolk movement.

As Myatt honestly writes in the article:

              “In the past thirty or more years, I have used every tactic I could, some covert, some overt, some dubious and perhaps dishonourable, to further our noble Cause, as I have, on occasion, used deceit to try and deceive our now powerful enemies. In the end I and those others who have used similar tactics have achieved nothing because the tactics, and sometimes the intention, were wrong, as I have slowly and painfully learned from experience. This post First Zionist War world is very different from the world which Adolf Hitler and the members of his NSDAP knew and many people – myself included – have in past mistaken some of the rhetoric of the past for the essence.”

We have taken the liberty of correcting some typos in the original text.

RT Crew
July 2018 ev

{1} The article is included in the pdf compilation Selected National Socialist Writings Of David Myatt.

°°°°°°°°°

Esoteric Hitlerism:
Idealism, the Third Reich and the Essence of National-Socialism

In respect of the future of National-Socialism – that idealistic, noble, but mis-understood way of life – it is important to understand that National-Socialist Germany was only a beginning of the practical implementation of National-Socialism. That is, a complete National-Socialist society was being worked toward, but was never fully achieved because of the circumstances of the time – in particular the advent of the First Zionist War (commonly called the Second World War) with the need for Germany to fight a total war in order to try and survive. In many ways, Adolf Hitler (as he himself admitted, for instance to Leon Degrelle) had to make several compromises in order to not only achieve power, but also to keep power in the face of external and internal problems.

The truth is that many Germans of the time were not National-Socialists – that is, upholders of the ethic of personal honour who strove to live by the ideals of duty to the folk and absolute loyalty to their comrades. Many Germans supported the political principles of National-Socialism for their own reasons, but had not changed themselves into honourable, idealistic individuals; that is, they had not achieved an inner, personal, revolution – a triumph of the will – based upon NS ideals. Similarly, many Institutions of time (one particularly thinks here of the Officer corps of the Germany Army) were not National-Socialist in nature.

Thus, while NS Germany (what it was, not what Zionist hate propaganda has made it appear) should be considered as an inspiring model for us and future generations, it should not be looked upon as the perfect, ideal, National-Socialist society. That ideal society was being built, through organizations such as the SS and the Hitler Youth, but was never achieved due to the triumph of the ignoble Zionists. In effect, NS Germany was but the prototype of the ideal society which it is possible for us to build, given a genuine revolution – that is, both an outer, social revolution, and an inner personal revolution among the majority of individuals.

It is our task – and that of future generations – to lay the foundations for this complete National-Socialist society. To do this, we must expound pure, idealistic National-Socialism, untainted by any compromise with the societies of our time. That is, we must expressly state what National-Socialism is and involves, however “impractical” or idealistic it might seem, and however unpopular.

It is not our task to simply win over, through the propaganda and rhetoric of a political movement, a majority of the people of a particular nation or society in order to try and win some sort of political power. This is not our task because such political power is transitory – and easily destroyed by our enemies – unless those people who have been won over are dedicated, idealistic National-Socialists.

We do not need political propaganda – such as stirring speeches, rallies, marches, strident appeals – which only ever appeal to the fickle emotions of people. Instead, we need reasoned literature; factual stories of National-Socialist heroism; and living examples of National-Socialism in action, both individual and communal. That is, we need to show the idealism, the truths, of National-Socialism by personal example – through our own deeds and projects, and through the deeds of those who struggled, and often died, for the cause of National-Socialism.

We need to do this because our aim is to create a new way of living – a totally new order – without any compromise whatsoever. Our aim is not to win (or worse, try to seize) some transitory political power by any means where, through compromise or lack of the right people in the right numbers, we sow the seeds of our own future downfall.

Our way must be the natural, organic way – to grow slowly, but securely, from small beginnings; to root ourselves deeply within our own people; so deeply that no storm of our enemy can uproot us. To root ourselves in such a way we must rid our cause of all the dishonourable, political, trappings our Cause has unfortunately acquired since the defeat of NS Germany. We must also do away with all the political trappings, all the emotive rhetoric, all the propaganda, all the compromises which Adolf Hitler and his NSDAP had to use in order to win power and begin to create a true National-Socialist society. That is, we must step out from the past and concentrate on the future, while still retaining our links to this past which is both our heritage and our inspiration.

We must understand and then expound the essence of National-Socialism, the eternal truths and wisdom of National-Socialism – and not continue to use, or rely on, the tactics which were once used, and had then to be used, in order to try and make this idealistic essence real in a particular society at a particular time in history.

The Essence of National-Socialism

The essence of National-Socialism can be expressed in three words: honour, loyalty and duty. Personal honour is the basis for the morality of National-Socialism; it is our guide to how we should conduct ourselves. Loyalty is one important practical expression of both personal honour and duty: our honour means that we are loyal to both our duty, and those to whom we have pledged our loyalty.

Our duty is to strive to aid Nature: that is, to strive for personal and racial excellence, for according to National-Socialism race and individual, noble, character are manifestations of Nature – of Nature striving to evolve toward higher forms, toward more Order. That is, our duty is to strive for a personal Triumph of the Will and a folkish Triumph of the Will. Our honour demands that we strive to do this duty in an honourable and loyal way – in accord with the ethics, the morality, of National-Socialism.

This means that whatever we do, we should strive to be honourable – that is, fair, courteous, reasonable, resolute and prepared to defend ourselves, and those to whom we have pledged loyalty. The morality of National-Socialism also demands that we uphold freedom, and truth. Both freedom and truth arise when strong individuals – individuals of moral character, guided by honour, loyalty and duty – do what is right and strive to create a noble way of living for themselves, their kin and their folk.

On the practical level we must accept that National-Socialism does not involve any kind of racial hatred, racial prejudice or racial intolerance. Rather, it expresses a concern for and love of, our own folk and desires our folk to live in a free and honourable society. Most importantly, National-Socialism expresses the desire for other races to be free, and for all free races to co-operate together for their mutual advantage, well-being and development. Correctly understood, National-Socialism is an affirmation of our humanity: a way of living applicable to all races, not just the Aryan race. It is an affirmation of our human diversity and difference, created by Nature on whom we all depend. This affirmation was evident, for instance, in the SS, which accepted members from individuals of non-Aryan cultures. The SS were modern warriors, with a warrior’s way of thinking and being: strong, proud, respectful of bravery and valour in others (including “the enemy”), honourable, given to humour in adversity, loving of their own kind, and open-minded and tolerant of other cultures.

What has hitherto not been very well understood in respect of National-Socialism, is that it is not race which defines our humanity – it is honour and reason. Race is our relation to Nature: how Nature is expressed, is manifest, in us. As such race is important and indeed vital; but so is honour. It is the combination of an acceptance of both race and honour which is National-Socialism. An affirmation of race without an affirmation honour is not National-Socialism, just as an affirmation of honour without an affirmation of race is not National-Socialism. It is this living, organic, dialectic of honour and race which defines National-Socialism itself, and a National-Socialist is an individual who strives to do their honourable duty to both their own race and Nature herself, of which other human races are a part. That is, a National-Socialist must always be honourable, whatever the consequences, or the perceived consequences. Quite often, this means a National-Socialist is faced with what seems to be difficult choices and difficult decisions, although in reality if National-Socialism itself is properly understood, there is no conflict, no moral dilemma and no difficulty in doing the right, the honourable, thing.

Thus if something, some act or deed, seems to affirm race – or be beneficial to one’s race – but is dishonourable, then that something is not something a National-Socialist should do. What honour does is define our duty to our race and other races – it prevents us from committing hubris: that is, prevents us from “overstepping the mark”, from being insolent toward Nature and “the gods” (or God).

It is this understanding, this wisdom, these truths, which we must defend, speak and write of, and which we must use to form the foundations of that New Order which we, and all honourable people of all races, desire to live in. Anything which contradicts this understanding, this wisdom, these truths, however beneficial, necessary or advantageous it may seem in the short term, must be rejected as a denial of our honourable duty.

Our enemy is not some other race (or races) – and not even the Zionists. Our enemy is ourselves: our lack of understanding; our lack of honour; our lack of reason; our inability (often out of laziness) to change ourselves for the better by using our will. We cannot blame our problems on someone else, on some race or races, or even the Zionists. What is now, came to be as it came to be, through the workings of life, of Nature herself and if we desire to change what now is, we can and will if we strive in the right way – in accord with the truths, the wisdom of life itself.

To achieve what we desire to achieve – to express our humanity, to work in harmony with Nature and so continue our evolution – we must achieve our own Triumph of the Will by striving to be honourable, by being loyal, and by striving to do our duty to Nature in an honourable way. It is as profoundly simple as that.

A Personal Learning

Like many National-Socialists who live in the post First Zionist War world, I have in the past, out of desire to at least do something, used both the rhetoric and the tactics employed by the NSDAP in the hope of gaining some kind of political power. Thus, my older writings – and the propaganda I employed as leader of the now disbanded National-Socialist Movement – contain much strident rhetoric and appeals for political action of one kind or another. I have given all of my adult life to striving to aid the Cause in one way or another, as have many other National-Socialists.

In the past thirty or more years, I have used every tactic I could, some covert, some overt, some dubious and perhaps dishonourable, to further our noble Cause, as I have, on occasion, used deceit to try and deceive our now powerful enemies. In the end I and those others who have used similar tactics have achieved nothing because the tactics, and sometimes the intention, were wrong, as I have slowly and painfully learned from experience. This post First Zionist War world is very different from the world which Adolf Hitler and the members of his NSDAP knew and many people – myself included – have in past mistaken some of the rhetoric of the past for the essence.

We have concentrated on fighting perceived enemies, and on somehow taking over the status quo, to the detriment of what is fundamentally important. We have perceived our duty as fighting these perceived enemies, and taking part in some war, whereas our real duty is to be and to strive to be a becoming, a continuation of our folk and of evolution itself – to belong to our folk; to be honourable; to express our humanity through our Nature-given talents and abilities; to create genuine folk communities in harmony with Nature.

We have been caught up in the new species of time which has been brought into existence in the world by the defeat of National-Socialist Germany, whereas we need to return to the time of our own being, of which National-Socialist Germany was but a brief but glorious glimpse: a striving toward. This time of our being is the time of honourable humans; of folk communities valuing ancestral customs; of striving for a balance with Nature, where what is sacred is understood and respected. This time is the way of individuals working together, slowly, over many decades by valuing what is right and doing only that which links them to the past, the future and Nature herself.

The time of this present world is the time of hubris; of arrogance; of a pride unrestrained by honour, loyalty and duty; of a terrible and costly war between abstract ideas and abstract values. For this present world is the inhuman world of a burgeoning, culture-destroying world-wide tyranny. This time is the time where societies strive against one another; where political parties vie for power using whatever means they can; of political campaigns and the desire to win votes or some kind of power.

We cannot fight the world of this modern abstract time without becoming of this time – without corrupting and losing the essence of our way; without losing our very being, as honourable, folk-aware, Nature-aware individuals in harmony with Nature and the cosmos beyond. Instead, we must just simply be what we are – or rather, strive to be what we should be, and let this world of this modern time continue as it will continue, toward its inevitable destruction. There is thus no external war to fight; no perceived enemy to struggle against; no political action. There is only a slow, necessary, building of the future based upon the wisdom of National-Socialism. There must be Blood and Soil, a homeland of individuals bound together through tradition, way of living, of being, and understanding, of love of the homeland, before there can be Conquest and Exploration.

The world of the slow time of Blood and Soil, of deep, wordless love of homeland, of a dwelling where Nature was understood and respected, of personal honour, of respecting folk traditions and ways, was what was brutally destroyed by the First Zionist War and the terrible, ignoble persecutions which followed.

What is the essence of the understanding now required – what is our correct way of being – is to transcend our own ego, our own personal lives; to see ourselves as a nexus between the past of our folk and its future. We must transcend our own personal concerns; even our own personal feelings and personal desires: the anger we may feel; the sadness. For it is this transcendence of ourselves, this seeing of ourselves as a nexus between our folk past and our folk future, which is the essence of true human understanding: the tremendous and revolutionary insight which National-Socialism brings and which is the time of the being we should strive to dwell in. We belong to our folk, to Nature and the very cosmos. Honour, loyalty and duty are but a means whereby we can dwell as we should: as human beings capable of evolving still further.

To dwell in this modern world with its modern abstract time, its politics, its contending societies, its egotism, its pride, its misplaced hatred, is to dwell in the realm of barbarism where our very humanity is at best denied, and at worst, lost.

Instead, we must cultivate the insight of ourselves as a living link, a nexus, as we must cultivate the understanding this insight brings. Thus, we should not seek to be of the societies of this modern time, but rather seek to build our own, new, societies, imbued with our own time – the time of Nature; of the folk community; of personal honour; of understanding the nexus which we are. Thus, and only thus, can we make real some time in the future, the essence of National-Socialism.

Until then, we can remember with fondness the world which has gone – glimpsed in the faded photographs of pre-war Germany; briefly captured in the epic Triumph of the Will; and recalled whenever we remember the sacrifices of those who perished fighting for the noble way of life we treasure and understand without the need for words.

David Myatt
JD 2451706.007


Aryan Behaviour

Reichsfolk

°°°°°°°°°

Editorial Note: We republish here an extract from The Complete Guide to the Aryan Way of Life {1} which guide distinguishes David Myatt’s revisionist version – his evolution – of the National Socialism of Adolf Hitler and which evolution of National Socialism marks him – in the words of one academic – as arguably one of the “principal proponent[s] of contemporary neo-Nazi ideology.” {2}

We cannot help but contrast Myatt’s description of Aryan Behaviour with the behaviour of many modern self-described “neo-nazis” in Britain, America, and elsewhere.

RT Crew
July 2018 ev

{1} The Complete Guide to the Aryan Way of Life is included in the pdf compilation Selected National Socialist Writings Of David Myatt.

{2} Michael, George. The New Media and the Rise of Exhortatory Terrorism. Strategic Studies Quarterly (United States Air Force), Volume 7 Issue 1, Spring 2013.

°°°°°°°°°

Aryan Behaviour

Aryan behaviour – in public and in private – derives from personal honour and self-discipline. An Aryan is dignified; not given to excessive show of personal emotion, and not given to dressing in an extravagant or flamboyant way. An Aryan is fair and just; and given to silence or humour in adversity. Above all, an Aryan is restrained, and seeks to be in control of themselves and whatever situation they find themselves in, using their skill, their reason, their experience, their Aryan character, inventiveness, resourcefulness and heroism, to overcome obstacles. An Aryan faces death calmly and honourably when death cannot be avoided, and would rather die than do anything dishonourable, anything un-Aryan.

Aryan behaviour is an outward sign of a person living and thinking like an Aryan. We should seek to be friends with, and seek to associate with, only those who live, think and act like Aryans: who uphold the Aryan way of life, and who show by their behaviour and deeds that they are worthy of our friendship and worthy to be our brothers and sisters.

Thinking Like An Aryan

Thinking like an Aryan involves us in judging everything – every situation, every problem and every person – by our Aryan standards of honour, loyalty and duty.

Thus, we should ask ourselves such things as: What is the honourable thing to do, here? If I do this, will it benefit my folk?; how will it affect Nature?


Bravo Daniel Barenboim

Reichsfolk

°°°°°°°°°

In an article in The Guardian newspaper – with the title This racist new law makes me ashamed to be Israeli – Daniel Barenboim, the world-renowned classical pianist, wrote:

                   “We have a law that confirms the Arab population as second-class citizens. It follows that this is a very clear form of apartheid. I don’t think the Jewish people lived for 20 centuries, mostly through persecution and enduring endless cruelties, in order to become the oppressors, inflicting cruelty on others. This new law does exactly that. Therefore, I am ashamed of being an Israeli today.” {1}

He is to be commended for plainly stating the reality, even though under the definition and explanation of anti-Semitism invented by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) – a definition and explanation increasingly used by police forces in Britain and elsewhere – his comments amount to “anti-Semitism” since the IHRA have stated that those claiming that “the State of Israel is a racist endeavour” are anti-Semites.

       But why are we – as modern National-Socialists – commending a Jew and a citizen of Israel? Because our ethical National-Socialism – the National-Socialism of Reichsfolk – is not racist {2} and because we know and we remember how Hitler and German National Socialists sought to co-operate with Jews; a co-operation evident in the Third Reich policy of allowing German Jews to emigrate and, despite the deluge of anti-NS propaganda to the contrary, in the friendly links between NS Germany, the SS, and various Jewish organizations. Thus, as mentioned in the seminal article Why National-Socialism is Not Racist {3},

[quote]
             SS Officer Adolf Eichmann was known to have travelled to Palestine in the years before the war where he met Jewish settlers, Jewish leaders, and German agents. His relations with these Jews were always very cordial and friendly.
             Of particular interest is the attempt, in 1941 (52yf) by the Jewish group Irgun Zevai Leumi (known to the British in Palestine as the Stern gang) to collaborate with Hitler and Germany:
             “On condition that the German government recognizes the national aspirations of the ‘Movement for the Freedom of Israel’ (Lehi), the National Military Organization (NMO) proposes to participate in the war on the side of Germany…” [Document number E234151-8 at Yad Vachem in Jerusalem.] {4}
             The German NS government, however, refused to recognize such Jewish “national aspirations” since it conflicted with the policy of their ally Mohammed Amin al-Husseini who was opposed to the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine.”
[/quote]

Would the history of the Third Reich have been different if Hitler had chosen to ally himself with such Jewish groups rather than with Mohammed Amin al-Husseini? Possibly.

       We also know that many other Jews in Britain, America, in Israel, and elsewhere, not only have views similar to that of Daniel Barenboim, but are also critical of the definition and explanation of anti-Semitism invented by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.

To believe that Jews everywhere have the same opinions, the same agenda, and always uncritically support Israel, is an example of the racial stereotyping, the prejudice, that ethical National-Socialists know is dishonourable and uncivilized.

Rachael Stirling
25th July 2018 ev

{1} https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/23/israel-racist-new-law-ashamed-apartheid-daniel-barenboim

{2} See, for example, https://reichsfolktimes.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/intro-reichsfolk.pdf

{3} David Myatt, Why National-Socialism is Not Racist, 111yf. The essay is included in the pdf compilation Selected National Socialist Writings Of David Myatt.

{4} Given the historical importance of this document we would not be surprised if it suddenly “disappeared” from the archives.


The Fundamental Flaws of Right-Wing Islamophobia

Adolf Hitler

°°°°°°°°°

The Fundamental Flaws of Right-Wing Islamophobia

It is both interesting and indicative that few – if any – of the fascist {1} and neo-nazi supporters of the current and increasing Right-Wing Islamophobia in Europe and America can see the fundamental flaws in the arguments used by the Right-Wing and “alt-right” leaders, ideologues, and groups they admire and support.

§ Their Islamophobia is fundamentally flawed because such supporters do not know or ignore how Adolf Hitler and real-life warrior groups such as the Waffen-SS viewed Islam: with a tolerance and a respect as voiced by Waffen-SS General Leon Degrelle who said:

{quote}
                   “German racialism meant re-discovering the creative values of their own race, re-discovering their culture. It was a search for excellence, a noble ideal. National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race, and wished that all other races did the same for themselves.

                   That was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS. The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs, and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an imam, each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression. This was our racialism. I was present when each of my Islamic comrades received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a pendant with a small Koran. Hitler was honoring them with this small symbolic gift. He was honoring them with what was the most important aspect of their lives and their history. National Socialist racialism was loyal to the German race and totally respected all other races.” Epic: The Story of the Waffen SS (Lecture given in 1982). Reprinted in The Journal of Historical Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 441-468. {2}

{/quote}

That Leon Degrelle was – for his war-time service – awarded medals such as Knight’s Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves (a German military award similar to the British Victoria Cross) says all that needs to be said about his combat experience, his personality, and his dedication to the cause of National Socialism. He was an example, par excellence, of the National Socialist warrior ideal, in stark contrast to most latter-day self-described “neo-nazis”.

§ Their Islamophobia is a fundamental flaw and indicative because all their Right-Wing and “alt-right” leaders, ideologues, and groups, propagandistically and illogically speak and write of “Muslim rape gangs” when the reality is (i) that those belonging to such so-called “grooming gangs” are not practising Muslims who follow the Quran and Sunnah, and (ii) the fact that some or all of them may have been born into Muslim families is irrelevant, just as the fact that serial killers such as Dennis Nielson, Fritz Haarmann, and Peter Sutcliffe, may have been baptised as Christians is irrelevant in respect of their adult crimes.

No rational person – in this day and age – condemns Christianity on the basis that some individuals baptised as Christians are serial killers, rapists, and murderers, or have Christian-sounding names. Yet Right-Wing and “alt-right” leaders, ideologues, and groups, propagandistically condemn Islam on the basis that those involved in some so-called “grooming gangs” have Muslim names and/or were born into Muslim families.

§ Their Islamophobia is also a fundamental flaw and indicative because not one of the Right-Wing and “alt-right” leaders and ideologues – from “Tommy Robinson” to Geert Wilders to Pamela Geller – has any years-long first-hand practical experience of living in a Muslim land and thus of interacting with Muslim families in traditional Muslim lands. Nor can any of them read the Quran and Sunnah in Arabic (an essential skill in respect of understanding Islam) even though they have spent years pontificating about the Quran and about Islam. Despite this lack of personal experience and knowledge, they all have the chutzpah to speak and write about Muslims and about Islam as if they were “experts” with their followers – who also lack such personal experience and knowledge – believing the Islamophobic propaganda such leaders and ideologues spew forth.

            Thus we have supporters of Right-Wing and “alt-right” leaders, ideologues, and groups, believing in and doing the propagandistic bidding of those who have no personal experience of and no scholarly knowledge of Islam and the Muslim way of life.

In other words, such supporters are being manipulated and brainwashed. Why?

Is it because all those Islamophobic Right-Wing, “alt-right”, leaders, ideologues, and groups openly or clandestinely support the Zionist entity which currently occupies Palestine and which entity has a vested interest in discrediting both Islam and those who by practical means – such as Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, the Taliban, al-Qaida, and Iran – are opposed to that entity and its influence in the Middle East and elsewhere?

Never – not once – have one of those Islamophobic Right-Wing, “alt-right”, leaders, ideologues, and groups openly criticized or questioned the veracity of the holocaust. Which holocaust is the founding myth of the Zionist entity which currently occupies Palestine, and which questioning is the essential “litmus test” that differentiates genuine fascists and National Socialists from the modern self-described variety.

All Islamophobic Right-Wing, “alt-right”, leaders, ideologues, and groups have so far failed that crucial “free speech” test: that test of being a real-life Enemy Of The State with such questioning of the veracity of the holocaust making them liable to persecution, arrest and imprisonment.

That they all continue to propagandistically pontificate about “free speech” while failing to be real, practical, examples of free speech – by being real-life Enemies of the State by questioning the now sacred dogma of the holocaust – is yet another example of their chutzpah, of their hubris, of their support for the Zionist entity which currently occupies Palestine.

Haereticus
May 2018 ev

{1} Fascism: “the advocacy of a particular nationalist viewpoint or form of government in a manner that seeks to ensure a certain conformity and an orderly way of life based on a particular definition of a nation and/or of a people.”

{2} See also his memoir The Eastern Front: Memoirs of a Waffen SS volunteer, 1941-1945. Institute for Historical Review. 2014. ISBN 9780939484768.